OPINION: UK must reject ICC warrants for Israeli leaders to protect the court’s integrity
Professor Rosa Freedman on why the request for the ICC to issue arrest warrants for Israeli politicians is an open-and-shut case of bad law
Hard cases make bad law. The request for the International Criminal Court to issue arrest warrants for Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Yoav Gallant is a very hard case that will make very bad law that would set a precedent that could easily undermine or destroy the court.
The new UK government must continue the work of its predecessor by submitting written observations as amicus curiae objecting to the application for arrest warrants on three main grounds.
First, the prosecutor, Karim Khan QC, has violated the court’s founding principle of complementarity. Second, the court does not have jurisdiction over the alleged crimes. And third, the ways in which the application was made to the judges may undermine, or be perceived as undermining, the court’s independence and impartiality.
The ICC is authorised only to address the four gravest categories of crimes: war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression. Considered to be the court of last resort, the ICC steps in only when national courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute alleged perpetrators. This is the principle of complementarity.
The court was established to complement rather than take over from national courts. Arrest warrants may only be issued national courts do not exist, or are not independent, or fail to prosecute alleged perpetrators. This clearly is not the case in terms of Israel, a democracy with an independent and impartial judiciary. It has not shied away from prosecuting senior political figures including Netanyahu. And Israel has told the International Court of Justice that it has opened some 70 cases for investigation.
But even if Israel is viewed as failing to prosecute alleged crimes, the ICC does not have jurisdiction to take over. Israel is not party to the Rome Statute, so the court does not have jurisdiction over its citizens.
Khan claims that Palestine is a member but does not address the fundamental point that the Rome Statute makes clear that only states can become parties. Palestine is not a state.
Some countries have provided political recognition of Palestine as a state, but they do not claim that this changes its legal or factual status. The United Nations has passed many resolutions giving Palestine ever-increasing rights but, crucially, as a non-state observer. This is because only states can be full UN members. And the UK has repeatedly emphasised that Palestine does not meet the criteria for statehood.
Commitment to the two-state solution is very different to claiming that the state of Palestine already exists or that it was able to become party to the Rome Statute in 2015. Pretending otherwise goes against the court’s constituent instrument.
The court was established to complement rather than take over from national courts. Arrest warrants may only be issued national courts do not exist, or are not independent, or fail to prosecute alleged perpetrators
Article 12(2) of the Rome Statute allows state parties to delegate to the court their authority over crimes committed in their territory. Even if the court claims that Palestine is a party, it still would not have jurisdiction for alleged crimes committed in Gaza because Palestine has no authority over them.
The Oslo Accords make clear that no Palestinian entity has authority over acts committed by Israeli nationals. The Oslo Accords are vital to relations between Israel and Palestine, and to the powers of the Palestinian Authority (or other Palestinian entities) in Gaza and the West Bank.
The Accords have conditioned almost 30 years of contact and interactions between Israel and the Palestinians. Both sides continue to affirm that those bilateral agreements are the legal framework governing their relations and conduct. The ICC does not have the power to disregard or change those agreements.
This is a very hard case because there are many who want to see Netanyahu and Hamas leaders held to account, and who are frustrated by the international community’s failures to end the war and secure the hostages’ release
The last issue is the way in which Khan applied for the arrest warrants. Announcing the application publicly means that the judges may be placed, or perceived as being placed, under pressure or influence from external actors. The highly unusual step that Khan took of hand-selecting a panel of experts to prepare a report, which was then published to support his application, also raises questions about pressure, or perception of pressure. Justice must not only be done but must also be seen to be done.
There are some who claim that if the arrest warrants are not issued there will be impunity for alleged crimes. This is not true. There are other accountability mechanisms including Israel’s national courts, national courts in other states where jurisdiction can be established, UN-created ad hoc investigative mechanisms or criminal tribunal, or human rights bodies.
This is a very hard case because there are many who want to see Netanyahu and Hamas leaders held to account, and who are frustrated by the international community’s failures to end the war and secure the hostages’ release.
It could make very bad law if arrest warrants are issued in contravention of the court’s constituent instrument and powers. The consequences will be far-reaching beyond the legitimacy of accountability over alleged crimes in Gaza but also court’s own legitimacy, without which the ICC could itself fail through states refusing to comply with it or withdrawing altogether.
• Rosa Freedman is professor of law, conflict and global development at the University of Reading,
Thank you for helping to make Jewish News the leading source of news and opinion for the UK Jewish community. Today we're asking for your invaluable help to continue putting our community first in everything we do.
For as little as £5 a month you can help sustain the vital work we do in celebrating and standing up for Jewish life in Britain.
Jewish News holds our community together and keeps us connected. Like a synagogue, it’s where people turn to feel part of something bigger. It also proudly shows the rest of Britain the vibrancy and rich culture of modern Jewish life.
You can make a quick and easy one-off or monthly contribution of £5, £10, £20 or any other sum you’re comfortable with.
100% of your donation will help us continue celebrating our community, in all its dynamic diversity...
Engaging
Being a community platform means so much more than producing a newspaper and website. One of our proudest roles is media partnering with our invaluable charities to amplify the outstanding work they do to help us all.
Celebrating
There’s no shortage of oys in the world but Jewish News takes every opportunity to celebrate the joys too, through projects like Night of Heroes, 40 Under 40 and other compelling countdowns that make the community kvell with pride.
Pioneering
In the first collaboration between media outlets from different faiths, Jewish News worked with British Muslim TV and Church Times to produce a list of young activists leading the way on interfaith understanding.
Campaigning
Royal Mail issued a stamp honouring Holocaust hero Sir Nicholas Winton after a Jewish News campaign attracted more than 100,000 backers. Jewish Newsalso produces special editions of the paper highlighting pressing issues including mental health and Holocaust remembrance.
Easy access
In an age when news is readily accessible, Jewish News provides high-quality content free online and offline, removing any financial barriers to connecting people.
Voice of our community to wider society
The Jewish News team regularly appears on TV, radio and on the pages of the national press to comment on stories about the Jewish community. Easy access to the paper on the streets of London also means Jewish News provides an invaluable window into the community for the country at large.
We hope you agree all this is worth preserving.
